Language

About Neta

PMOS, from your own record.

Why this exists.

PMOS (formerly PCOS) affects around 1 in 8 women worldwide, about 170 million. Nearly half of them, 47%, see three or more health professionals before anyone names it. Most get told 'lose weight and take the pill.' That isn't medicine. That's dismissal.

PMOS presents differently in every body, and advice written for all of it was written for nobody in particular. Neta exists to fix that: to work from what your body actually does, rather than from what worked for someone else.

Who built this.

Neta was built by Pablo Gabriel Campos Cordero. Not a doctor, and not a woman with PMOS. That's worth saying plainly rather than leaving you to work it out. A man building a women's-health app has one obvious failure mode: deciding, from the outside, what women need. The counterweight is the evidence the app leans on, which comes from researchers like Lara Briden who have spent careers on it. Where that counterweight isn't enough (clinical judgement, crisis language, anything about weight), the app doesn't improvise. It says it's holding back, and it waits.

Medical credibility.

Neta doesn't have a named medical advisor yet. Conversations are underway, and until one is formally in place, nothing here will imply otherwise: a credential you can't check is worth less than an honest gap. What happens instead, today: every claim the coach states as established has to come from a source that can be cited, and if it can't be cited you don't see it. The framework comes from published work, not from this app. And the areas that genuinely need a clinician's sign-off are switched off rather than guessed at. Pregnancy guidance, anything numeric about body weight, and the crisis sections still marked as awaiting a specialist: those stay unwritten until someone qualified writes them. When this section names a person and their credentials, it will be because the role is real.

Sources

  1. Teede HJ et al. Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome, the new name for polycystic ovary syndrome: a multistep global consensus process. The Lancet. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00717-8
  2. Bozdag G, Mumusoglu S, Zengin D, Karabulut E, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction. 2016;31(12):2841-2855
  3. Briden L. Period Repair Manual: Natural Treatment for Better Hormones and Better Periods. 2nd edition (Ch. 7-8). Pan Macmillan, 2017. ISBN 978-1976159480
  4. Mousa A et al. International PCOS guideline clinical research priorities roadmap. eClinicalMedicine (The Lancet). 2024
  5. Moran C, Tena G, Moran S, Ruiz P, Reyna R, Duque X. Prevalence of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Related Disorders in Mexican Women. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2010;69(4):274-280. Found 6.0% (NIH criteria) and 6.6% (Rotterdam) in 150 Mexican women aged 20-45, below the global figure, not above it. Neta previously cited a 21-22% Mexican prevalence attributed to INPer; that figure is a health-authority statement whose population and diagnostic criteria are not published, and it disagrees with the only peer-reviewed Mexican measurement that could be found, so no Mexico-specific prevalence claim is made any more.
  6. Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome, Dietary Supplements, and TikTok: A Balanced Supplement Stew or Everything But the Kitchen Sink? Fertility and Sterility. 2024
  7. Teede HJ et al. Recommendations From the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2023;108(10):2447-2469. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad463

What Neta isn't.

  • It isn't medical advice. Neta doesn't diagnose, and it doesn't classify you into a type. It explains what the evidence says and shows you what your own data does.
  • It isn't a substitute for a doctor. If your symptoms are urgent, see a clinician, not Neta.
  • It isn't staffed by physicians. No clinician reads your logs or your messages, and Neta doesn't provide one-on-one clinical care of any kind.
  • It isn't trying to be everything. It's a specialized tool for one specific condition, used by women who already know they need a more personalized approach.

What Neta stands on.

Evidence over opinion.

Every recommendation cites a peer-reviewed source. If it can't be cited, it isn't recommended.

No kickbacks. Ever.

Neta doesn't take money from supplement brands. Not now, not later. Its recommendations are about what works, not what pays.

Your data, your data.

Neta doesn't sell it. It doesn't share it. It only collects what it can return to you as visible value.

Honesty about timelines.

PMOS isn't reversed in 30 days. Neta won't promise that.